Re: Quick reference guide status update

OWL Quick Reference Guide reviewers:

I uploaded a revised version, taking into comments from RPI internal reviews.

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/images/8/8b/Owl2-refcard_2008-10-01.pdf

Jie

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu> wrote:
> There is an updated version of the card. Major revisions include:
> * Reorganized OWL vocabulary. Currently it is redivided into three
> columns: language elements (classes, data ranges, properties and
> individuals); axioms and assertions; others (annotation, ontology
> axioms, datatypes, name spaces)
> * Move owl:AllDifferent and owl:AllDisjoint* into assertions as
> suggested by Peter
> * Change the title to "RDF Syntax version" as suggested by Peter
> * Add two mini examples in RDF/XML and RDF/Turtle syntaxes
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/images/8/8b/Owl2-refcard_2008-10-01.pdf
>
> There is actually a little blank space available on the card. I wonder
> if we should add some other information, or make the two examples more
> complete.
>
> List of other language versions is shown as "TBA" at this moment. We
> will wait for request from the WG for other syntaxes.
>
> Comments are welcome
>
> Regards
>
> Jie
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Alan Ruttenberg
> <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
>> Date: Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: Quick reference guide
>> To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Elisa F. Kendall" <ekendall@sandsoft.com>, dlm@ksl.stanford.edu,
>> Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
>>
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> I have an updated version on the wiki [1]. Please note that it is
>> still an incomplete draft. As we agreed in the last call, a complete
>> version may be finished by the next week call. We made the following
>> major changes
>>
>> * incorporate comments from Uli (reorganizing).
>> * to save space, datatype property and object property axioms are not
>> in separate sections any more. Instead, the distinction is made in
>> their domains and ranges.
>> * Sync the naming and domain/range setting with the current semantics spec.
>> * Add notes that owl:DataRange and owl:distinctMembers (I assume that
>> due to Peter's proposal) are deprecated.
>> * Add some missing terms, e.g., owl:subject
>> * Add semantics to owl:hasKey
>> * Move facets to the datatype table
>> * Fill in the 3 profiles
>>
>> Elisa, Deb and Evan may have their comments later.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Image:Owl2-refcard_2008-09-24.pdf
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Jie
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jie
> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
>



-- 
Jie
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie

Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 19:59:33 UTC