Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)

On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:

> On 28 okt 2008, at 09:06, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> What about '.owlx'?
>>
>> maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf'  
>> and
>> 'owlm' for the other two.
>>
>> Ivan
>
> Although certainly prettier,

By leaps and bounds.

> I think it would create problems on FAT-based file systems that  
> (still) use the 8.3 naming scheme as these may truncate a long  
> extension to three characters.

But they would truncate to .owl, right? That seems harmless to me.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 08:56:18 UTC