RE: proposal to close ISSUE-56 - Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL?

+1

Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>On Behalf Of Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 3:41 PM
>To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
>Subject: proposal to close ISSUE-56 - Specify standard "repairs" for
>moving select RDF documents to OWL?
>
>
>Issue 56 asks for a set of standard repairs that tools could perform to
>RDF documents that are not in OWL 2 DL so that they become OWL 2 DL.
>This issue has been sitting with no action with quite some time.
>
>It seems to me that this sort of thing is more in the scope of the SWBP
>WG.  I propose that this issue be closed as being out of scope for this
>working group.
>
>Even if standard repairs are determined to be in the scope of this WG,
>starting a new document at this stage of the WG doesn't seem to be a
>wise thing to do, particularly if it consumes time at face-to-face or
>other meetings that should be devoted to solving our remaining technical
>issues.
>
>Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>Bell Labs Research