Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> The resolution of ISSUE-145 calls for MIME types for Functional Syntax,
> Manchester Syntax, and XML Serialization.
> 
> To polish this off, we need the actual mime types.  It is also a good
> idea to specify a preferred extension and some MAC stuff.  I think that
> we need to make a "decision" on these.  I suggest that if no consensus
> emerges before 5 November that we should discuss this on 5 November.
> 
> 
> The current suggestions (mine modified by Ivan):
> 
>   MIME Type  Extension MAC file type
> 
> Functional text/owl-functional .ofn  TEXT  
> Manchester text/owl-manchester .omn  TEXT
> XML  application/owl+xml ????  ???
> 

What about '.owlx'?

maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf' and
'owlm' for the other two.

Ivan

> Do we actually need to have a MAC file type?
> 
> 
> peter
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf