- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:29:58 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> There has been some discussion of whether OWL can use XSD's new datatype > dateTime with required timezone, because our notion of equality derives > from the timeline for time, not the XSD 7-value internal data structure > for xsd:dateTime. However, our notion of equality *is* the notion of > equality used in XSD for dateTime values with a required timezone, and > thus retains compatibility with XSD. > > I propose that we resolve ISSUE-138 by staying with owl:dateTime in the > next round of publication but to put in a note saying that this datatype > is to be considered xsd:dateTime with a required timezone and that we > will move to the new XSD name for this datatype as soon as it is > determined. Isn't the next publication expected to be Last Call? Do you have any indication how long it will talk to have this determination? -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 13 October 2008 17:30:43 UTC