RE: new round of snapshots

Hello,

I've fixed the links.

Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sandro Hawke
> Sent: 08 October 2008 17:53
> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: new round of snapshots
> 
> 
> 
> 1.  I think I've fixed the HTML entity problems that plagued several
>     documents.  There is now a "diff-from-wiki.html" generated for each
>     document, which should make it fairly easy to check for document
>     mutilation:
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-syntax-20081008/diff-from-wiki
>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-semantics-20081008/diff-from-wiki
>    ... etc
> 
> 
>     So, actually, html->dom->html can't be done perfectly since it's not
>     1-1.  This shows up in the diff for Syntax by highlighting a place
>     where "|" was put in the wiki as a numeric entity, and the −
>     entity was not used when it could/should have been.  Neither of
>     these are a problem, and if they are changed in the wiki there
>     should be no green/red in the diff except at the top & bottom.  (If
>     it starts to be clean like this, I can automate the check of
>     course.)
> 
> 2.  I'm not sure the References problem Alan was seeing.  My code was
>     actually using "editors" whenever "author's" wasn't defined, so it
>     cut over properly as far as I can/could tell.
> 
> 3.  Test/Conformance had some broken anchors/links which I fixed
> 
> 4.  Profiles has many broken fragments:
> 
>     Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
>         ref-conformance: 854, 904, 1664
>         ref-owl-2-rdf-mapping: 1689
>         ref-owl-2-rdf-semantics: 1660, 1697
>         ref-owl-2-specification: 340, 437, 479, 497, 517, 520, 527, 537, 547, 554, 573, 688, 692,
> 731, 764, 821, 830, 912, 917, 960, 1012, 1028, 1049, 1074
>         Relationship_between_OWL_2_RL_and_OWL_2_Full: 853
>         OWL_2_RL_Ontologies: 844, 850
>         ref-owl-2-direct-semantics: 1711
> 
> 5.  (I think the duplicate "Abstract" is actually correct.)
> 
> 6.  I still need to put the SOTD text into place, and write the FPWD
>     text.
> 
> I think that's it.  Maybe we can publish later today?
> 
>        -- Sandro

Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 18:07:54 UTC