W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)

From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:43:58 +0100
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <30808B8B-8B26-4DD9-80A5-6521376BACA6@uva.nl>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>

On 28 okt 2008, at 09:06, Ivan Herman wrote:
> What about '.owlx'?
>
> maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf' and
> 'owlm' for the other two.
>
> Ivan

Although certainly prettier, I think it would create problems on FAT- 
based file systems that (still) use the 8.3 naming scheme as these may  
truncate a long extension to three characters.

-Rinke

>> Do we actually need to have a MAC file type?
>>
>>
>> peter
>>
>
> -- 
>
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

-----------------------------------------------
Drs. Rinke Hoekstra

Email: hoekstra@uva.nl    Skype:  rinkehoekstra
Phone: +31-20-5253499     Fax:   +31-20-5253495
Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke

Leibniz Center for Law,          Faculty of Law
University of Amsterdam,            PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,             The Netherlands
-----------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 08:44:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC