RE: new round of snapshots

Hi Sandro!

In the references sections, if there is only a single editor, it's still

  "NAME_OF_EDITOR, eds."

(plural form).

See for example the link to the RDF-Based Semantics in

  <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-test-20081008/#References>

This seems to be automatically generated by your scripts, since it's not in
the original Wiki version of that document, see:

  <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test#References>

Is this intended?
 
Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>On Behalf Of Sandro Hawke
>Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 6:53 PM
>To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
>Subject: new round of snapshots
>
>
>
>1.  I think I've fixed the HTML entity problems that plagued several
>    documents.  There is now a "diff-from-wiki.html" generated for each
>    document, which should make it fairly easy to check for document
>    mutilation:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-syntax-20081008/diff-from-
>wiki
>   http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-semantics-20081008/diff-
>from-wiki
>   ... etc
>
>
>    So, actually, html->dom->html can't be done perfectly since it's not
>    1-1.  This shows up in the diff for Syntax by highlighting a place
>    where "|" was put in the wiki as a numeric entity, and the &minus;
>    entity was not used when it could/should have been.  Neither of
>    these are a problem, and if they are changed in the wiki there
>    should be no green/red in the diff except at the top & bottom.  (If
>    it starts to be clean like this, I can automate the check of
>    course.)
>
>2.  I'm not sure the References problem Alan was seeing.  My code was
>    actually using "editors" whenever "author's" wasn't defined, so it
>    cut over properly as far as I can/could tell.
>
>3.  Test/Conformance had some broken anchors/links which I fixed
>
>4.  Profiles has many broken fragments:
>
>    Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
>        ref-conformance: 854, 904, 1664
>        ref-owl-2-rdf-mapping: 1689
>        ref-owl-2-rdf-semantics: 1660, 1697
>        ref-owl-2-specification: 340, 437, 479, 497, 517, 520, 527, 537,
>547, 554, 573, 688, 692, 731, 764, 821, 830, 912, 917, 960, 1012, 1028,
>1049, 1074
>        Relationship_between_OWL_2_RL_and_OWL_2_Full: 853
>        OWL_2_RL_Ontologies: 844, 850
>        ref-owl-2-direct-semantics: 1711
>
>5.  (I think the duplicate "Abstract" is actually correct.)
>
>6.  I still need to put the SOTD text into place, and write the FPWD
>    text.
>
>I think that's it.  Maybe we can publish later today?
>
>       -- Sandro