W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: proposal to close ISSUE-56 - Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:01:28 +0100
Message-Id: <943BB945-2C65-4236-AD72-37899D7E8ACD@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>

On 9 Oct 2008, at 15:51, Ivan Herman wrote:

> I agree.
> Having said that, we have to realize that, at this moment, there is no
> other group that would pick that issue up at W3C. SWBP does not exist
> any more, the SWD (SW Deployment) group will round up its work after
> finishing RDFa, SKOS, and some other, smaller things. It is unclear at
> this moment who and how will pick up this whole area of additional
> outreach in terms of practice documents.

OWLED. We have a Wiki and everything. Also, at least yearly meetings,  
and we could have more (even telecons). I strongly suggest that Alan  
bring this up in Oct.

Much more lightweight too (which I think is appropriate for this sort  
of thing).

> It may help if, later in the
> lifspan of this group, the OWL WG would identify some areas where such
> deployment type of work would be worth investing into via some  
> other fora.

Received on Thursday, 9 October 2008 14:58:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC