Thursday, 31 July 2008
Wednesday, 30 July 2008
- Re: ConNegging on Description Pages (was RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data)
- Virtuoso Optimizations for the Berlin SPARQL Benchmark
- Re: ANN: BBC Music Linked Data Goodness
- Re: ConNegging on Description Pages (was RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data)
- FYI: DERI, NUI Galway launches the boards.ie SIOC Data Competition
- RFC: Berlin SPARQL Benchmark
- Re: ConNegging on Description Pages (was RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data)
- Re: ConNegging on Description Pages (was RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data)
- Re: ConNegging on Description Pages (was RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data)
Tuesday, 29 July 2008
- ANN: BBC Music Linked Data Goodness
- Re: Why not a generic skos:label datatype property? Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
Wednesday, 30 July 2008
- Re: ConNegging on Description Pages (was RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data)
- ConNegging on Description Pages (was RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data)
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Why not a generic skos:label datatype property? Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
Tuesday, 29 July 2008
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Why not a generic skos:label datatype property? Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Why not a generic skos:label datatype property? Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- RE: Why not a generic skos:label datatype property? Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Why not a generic skos:label datatype property? Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- VoCamp: Informal "Hackfests" for Vocabulary/Ontology Creation and Publishing
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
Monday, 28 July 2008
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: dbpedia.org DNS - another 5+ years maybe?
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: dbpedia.org DNS - another 5+ years maybe?
- RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- dbpedia.org DNS - another 5+ years maybe?
- RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- RE: Southampton Pub data as linked open data
- Southampton Pub data as linked open data
Friday, 25 July 2008
- SPARQL your way to stupor...Southampton first semantic web pub guide?
- RE: Cool URI for SCOT
- Re: Cool URI for SCOT
- Re: Cool URI for SCOT
- Cool URI for SCOT
Thursday, 24 July 2008
- CFP: CISWSN 2008 - 2nd Workshop on Collective Intelligence in Semantic Web and Social Networks
- Re: Semantic CrunchBase
Wednesday, 23 July 2008
Friday, 18 July 2008
- RE: Vapour 2.0, a Linked Data and RDF vocabularies validator
- RE: Vapour 2.0, a Linked Data and RDF vocabularies validator
- Re: Vapour 2.0, a Linked Data and RDF vocabularies validator
Thursday, 17 July 2008
- Semantic CrunchBase
- Re: UMBEL Publicly Released
- Nice Linked Data Application & Use Presentation from our Bio2RDF colleagues
- Announcing OpenLink Virtuoso, Open-Source Edition, v5.0.7
- Re: Vapour 2.0, a Linked Data and RDF vocabularies validator
- Re: UMBEL Publicly Released
- Announcing OpenLink Virtuoso, Open-Source Edition, v5.0.7
- Announcing OpenLink Virtuoso, Open-Source Edition, v5.0.7
- Linked Data tutorial at ISWC2008
- RE: Vapour 2.0, a Linked Data and RDF vocabularies validator
- ANN: Vapour 2.0, a Linked Data and RDF vocabularies validator
- Re: UMBEL Publicly Released
Wednesday, 16 July 2008
Tuesday, 15 July 2008
- Second CfP OWLED 2008
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- RE: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
Monday, 14 July 2008
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- RE: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- Re: RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
- RDFa + RDF/XML Considered Harmful? (was RE: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data)
Thursday, 10 July 2008
Sunday, 13 July 2008
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
Saturday, 12 July 2008
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
- Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)
Thursday, 10 July 2008
Friday, 11 July 2008
Thursday, 10 July 2008
Friday, 11 July 2008
Thursday, 10 July 2008
- Re: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- SW Marketing: Effective Sales Pitch for VCs and Non-Geeks in General
- RE: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- RE: SW Marketing: Effective Sales Pitch for VCs / Girlfriends / etc?
- RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
Wednesday, 9 July 2008
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- RE: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- RE: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- RE: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- RE: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- RE: TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- TimBL mentions Linking Open Data on BBC Radio4
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
Tuesday, 8 July 2008
Saturday, 5 July 2008
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
Friday, 4 July 2008
Thursday, 3 July 2008
Wednesday, 2 July 2008
- Re: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data
- "Show us a better way" - UK Public Info shuffles closer to openness; Competition with £20k prize