W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Southampton Pub data as linked open data

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:10:26 +0100
Message-Id: <5EAFD391-0CBA-4DC0-B109-4CEBCD0D5F69@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, John Goodwin <John.Goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk>, Chris Wallace <Chris.Wallace@uwe.ac.uk>, public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>

On 29 Jul 2008, at 15:41, Guus Schreiber wrote:

> Bijan Parsia wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2008, at 15:08, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
>>> Making something like pub:name a subProperty of rdfs:label is  
>>> essential
>> Hardly essential.
> On what evidence do you base this statement? In our application  
> projects we make extensive use of subproperties of rdfs:label.

You cut at the wrong place.

> Guus
>>> for the Tabulator

It's not *essential* for the Tabulator.

I would argue that *this way of marking* display properties isn't  
essential either. It may be unchangable legacy right now. But the  
functional difference between

	displayName rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label.

	displayName annotatedToBeOfType  DisplayInDetailView

is not great. Actually, it's better in the latter.

Tim said that we should change modeling to accommodate Tabulator and  
the OWL DL systems should be modified. But one could as easily put  
things other way round and ask Tabulator to change.

(Legacy *user* issues are different, IMHO.)

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 15:08:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:40 UTC