Bernhard Schandl a écrit : >> Just to be sure everyone caught it correctly : there is *no* such >> property as skos:label *so far* in the SKOS vocabulary. >> My proposal is to introduce it in SKOS as a clean, OWL-DL conformant, >> alternative to various hacking of rdfs:label non-semantics. > > Why not use the already existing skos:prefLabel for this? Because skos:prefLabel has specific semantics relevant to the library/thesaurus world (like a single prefLabel in a given language) which might be, well, too ... specific :-) for a general labeling use. > > Also, the SKOS extension for labelling (XL) may be a good starting > point for this; this vocabulary already allows one to define different > labels and also model relationships between them. > <http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#L4945> This is for *reified* (so-to-speak) labels, in advanced terminology management. Nothing to do with the current debate, what we need is something as simple and generic in scope as rdfs:label, but defined as a datatype property. Bernard -- *Bernard Vatant *Knowledge Engineering ---------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** *3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com> ---------------------------------------------------- Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> Blog: Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 16:30:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:20:40 UTC