Hugh Glaser wrote: > Thanks guys, a really interesting and important discussion. > However, after the last couple of postings I have the feeling I may agree > with both of you. > Is that possible? > Bijan et. al. are right about the semantics of owl:sameAs, but as I've said before, I think that something weaker needs to be coined ("lod:equivalentTo") that states that two URIs refer to the same thing but that any semantic entailments *may* not hold (i.e. user beware). That's a dangerous thing, I agree, but it seems to be what the Linked Data community needs and what's happening organically in the wild with the (ab)use of owl:sameAs. > Hugh > >Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 09:55:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:40 UTC