W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data)

From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:04:23 +0100
To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@PioneerCA.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C4A01E57.25CB5%hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

By context we mean quite a lot more (I would call your context something like provenance, which is a part of the whole context).
So we might like to say when the statements were believed to be true; what was the policy we applied to build the knowledge (did we allow false positives to avoid false negatives or vice versa, etc); is this about administrative regions or topographical regions?
And then of course their is trust...

On 12/07/2008 04:21, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@PioneerCA.com> wrote:

For a large knowledge base like this, I think the appropriate context of a
particular entry would be -- origin/source of data for that entry.

Received on Sunday, 13 July 2008 20:05:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:20:40 UTC