- From: Frederick Giasson <fred@fgiasson.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:06:01 -0400
- To: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
- Cc: Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com>, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Chris, FYI: web site & pdf document fixed. Thanks! Take care, Fred >> UMBEL (Upper Mapping and Binding Exchange Layer) [1] is a lightweight >> ontology for relating Web content and data to a standard set of >> 20,000 subject concepts. Based on OpenCyc [2], these subject concepts >> have defined relationships between them, and can act as semantic >> binding nodes for any data or Web content. > > Very nice work and great to see that UMBEL is available as Linked Data > and already interlinked with various ontologies and datasets. > >> A further 1.5 million named entities have been extracted from >> Wikipedia and mapped to the UMBEL reference structure with >> cross-links to YAGO [3] and DBpedia [4]. > > In order to allow people to browse from DBpedia into UMBEL and in > order to give Semantic Web crawlers more starting points to crawl > UMBEL and its interlinked datasets, it would be great to set RDF links > from DBpedia into UMBEL. > > Would it be possible that you send us the 1.5 million RDF links from > UMBEL to DBpedia that you already got so that we can serve them > together with DBpedia via our Linked Data interface and SPARQL endpoint? > > Reading the UMBEL documentation, I noticed that you use the > umbel:isLike property to link to DBpedia and the owl:sameAs property > to link to YAGO. For instance: > > ne:Pfizer umbel:isLike dbpedia:Pfizer > ne:Pfizer owl:sameAs yago:Pfizer > > The UMBEL spec defines umbel:isLike as > > "Additionally, the property umbel:isLike can be used to state that two > named entities "likely" have the same identity." > > Why do you think that your RDF links to YAGO are more likely to be > correct than your links into DBpedia? > > As all three datasets are derived from Wikipedia and Wikipedia page > identifiers should be present in all three datasets, I think we could > use owl:sameAs between all three. > > Keep on the great work and let's hope that UMBEL develops into an > important interlinking hub for the Web of Data. > > Cheers > > Chris > > >> The system can easily be extended with additional dictionaries of >> named entities, including ones specific to enterprises or domains. >> >> UMBEL is provided as open source under the Creative Commons 3.0 >> Attribution-Share Alike license. The complete ontology with all >> subject concepts, definitions, terms and relationships can be freely >> downloaded [see 5]. All subject concepts and named entities are >> available as Linked Data [see 5]. Five volumes of documentation [5] >> are also available. >> >> The release is accompanied by about a dozen Web services [6] for >> using or manipulating UMBEL, along with a new introductory slide show >> [7]. >> >> Additional release information may be found on Fred's [8] or my [9] >> separate blog postings. >> >> We welcome those with interest or suggestions for improvements to do >> so through the UMBEL discussion forum [10]. We will shortly be >> putting easier services online for such input. >> >> So, enjoy! We look forward to your commentary, suggestions and >> putting UMBEL under production-grade stress. We know will be doing >> the same! >> >> Regards, Mike >> >> >> [1] http://www.umbel.org/ >> [2] http://www.opencyc.org >> [3] http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~suchanek/downloads/yago/ >> [4] http://dbpedia.org >> [5] http://www.umbel.org/documentation.html >> [6] http://umbel.zitgist.com/ >> [7] http://www.slideshare.net/mkbergman/ >> [8] >> http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2008/07/16/starting-to-play-with-the-umbel-ontology/ >> >> [9] http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=449 >> [10] http://groups.google.com/group/umbel-ontology/ >> >
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:06:46 UTC