RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015
UCR WD published!
Probably Regrets for 2015-10-01 WG Telecon
shapes-ISSUE-97 (sh:derivedValues): Proposal to define constraints using derived values [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-96 (Violation IDs): Should the validation results contain stable IDs to indicate the type of violation [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-95 (Template Simplifications): Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism [SHACL Spec]
Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition
- Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition
- Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition
- Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition
AW: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:"
Reference to ReSpec without "http:"
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 24 September 2015
Question about directValueType
shapes-ISSUE-94 (hsolbrig): Should RDF syntax requirements be separated from SHACL semantics [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-93 (hsolbrig): SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements [SHACL Spec]
Question about datatype property constraint.
Turtle file
Question about the behavior of property shapes
Another formatting proposal.
Proposed enhancement to the SHACL spec
shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Changes to sh:ClosedShapeConstraint? (was: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec])
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec]
Editing the SHACL Spec
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 24 September 2015
Editorial work question
shapes-ISSUE-90 (Literal focus nodes): Can the focus node be a literal? [SHACL Spec]
(Editorial): SPARQL definitions can now be hidden
shacl document
propose to make repeated-properties additive
- Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive
- Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 17 September 2015
Spec has been updated
Re: my vote on ISSUE-70
Editing examples
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 17 September 2015
comments on current version of SHACL document
- Re: comments on current version of SHACL document
shapes-ISSUE-89 (recursion without properties): How should recursion that does not involve a property be handled? [SHACL Spec]
SHACL spec advanced part revisited
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for F2F 8-10 September 2015
SHACL core spec revisited
ISSUE-85: spec updated
shapes-ISSUE-88 (labra): qualified values [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-87 (Turtle file): Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec]
ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints?
- Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints?
shapes-ISSUE-85 (only one xor): what is the definition of XOR? [SHACL Spec]
question on on shacl semantics
logic as the compact syntax for SHACL
How to do repetition in SHACL
shapes-ACTION-29: Provide a proposal for recursion (from oscl + shex static analysis)
Proposal for Official WG Food
section on the relationship between SHACL and RDFS
Suggested redesign of Operations section
fixing http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/
Re: Shall we add sh:InversePropertyScope and sh:AllObjectsScope?
- Re: Shall we add sh:InversePropertyScope and sh:AllObjectsScope?
- Re: Shall we add sh:InversePropertyScope and sh:AllObjectsScope?
Spec editing and Github
RDF Data Shape WG Minutes for 3 September
my proposed introduction to the SHACL document
- Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document
- Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document
my proposal for ISSUE-51
Draft status
Feedback on SHACL Editor's draft
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 3 September 2015
Primer?
shapes-ISSUE-84 (Allowed IRIs): Constraint to limit IRIs of focus nodes to a given enumeration (similar to owl:oneOf) [SHACL Spec]
Comments on FPWD
review of SHACL document
- Re: review of SHACL document (First pass of responses)
- Re: review of SHACL document (Second pass of responses)