- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 22:52:10 -0700
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 8/31/15 10:47 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > > SHACL can certainly express all this, but maybe not with its Core > Vocabulary. It's still SHACL though. Note that this is included in Use Case #1 as a needed feature: "3.1 UC1: Model validation There is a general need to validate that the instance data matches the models that have been defined in RDFS or OWL. The primary validation requirement is to ensure that the appropriate information is given for each property (or class) in the model. As examples, one could require that each property must have a domain, or that classes must be explicitly stated in the instance data. Input to this case is the RDF representation of an RDFS (or OWL) ontology. Summary: Requires the ability to check whether certain information is given/available for a property or class." And also that this is the second requirement that has been brought forward from the library/archive community as a strong requirement that seems to be dismissed even though we included it in the use cases for SHACL. Would making this an issue be the best way to move forward? kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 05:52:41 UTC