Re: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:"

Hi!

> Why would anyone want to retrieve ReSpec using http:?

I didn't think of the fact that using https instead of neither http nor 
https also works for http: requests.
Eric? once told me to remove the http part to get ReSpec working 
remotely.

I'm totally fine with using https: instead of always having to change it 
if I want to edit the document & check it locally.

regards,
simon

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2015-09-28 00:22, schrieb Arthur Ryman:
> Simon/Holger,
> 
> I fail to understand the benefit of retrieving ReSpec with http:
> versus https: dependent on how we retrieve the spec. If we feel that
> https: is more secure then let's just put https: in the ReSpec URL.
> ReSpec is not part of our spec so there is no reason to couple the
> scheme used to retrieve it with the scheme used to retrieve our spec.
> If we use https: for ReSpec then readers will get the added security
> benefit. Why would anyone want to retrieve ReSpec using http:?
> 
> -- Arthur
> 
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Simon Steyskal 
> <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>> Von: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
>> Datum: 26.09.2015 01:04 (GMT+01:00)
>> An: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
>> Betreff: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:"
>> 
>> On 9/26/15 4:37 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote:
>>> Simon,
>>> 
>>> That was me. I recently had to add the http: part so I could view the
>>> formatted spec from the file system while editing. How do you suggest
>>> that editors work? Copy respect to their file system? Delete the 
>>> http:
>>> part before committing?
>> 
>> When I start editing I usually insert the http: and (unless I forget 
>> it)
>> take it back out before committing.
>> 
>> Holger
>> 
>>

Received on Monday, 28 September 2015 05:28:55 UTC