- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 06:59:17 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2015 20:59:51 UTC
Ah yes and that's what I actually did - it's sh:Violation now. My summary email was wrong. Thanks for pointing that out Holger On 9/18/15 6:56 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > Thanks Holger but there is a mistake. The resolution was to rename > sh:Error as sh:Violation not sh:Failure. > > Regards. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies > - IBM Software Group > > > Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote on 09/17/2015 12:42:48 PM: > > > From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> > > To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org> > > Date: 09/17/2015 12:44 PM > > Subject: Spec has been updated > > > > I have applied the two resolutions from today > > > > - Deleted sh:XorConstraint > > - Renamed sh:Error to sh:Failure > > > > and I am finished with editing the spec for now. > > > > I believe the suggestion today was to give everyone a few more days to > > review the current state, and unless there are serious remaining issues > > decide towards a FPWD in the upcoming meeting. > > > > If you have comments, please make specific proposals on how the wording > > needs to be changed. > > > > Thanks > > Holger > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2015 20:59:51 UTC