Re: Turtle file

Peter,

Yep.

My concern with that file is that it contains many terms not discussed
or reviewed by the WG. I feel that it reflects how Holger implemented
his processor. For example, he decided to implement the built-ins as
templates, which has a certain elegance, but is not required for
compliance AFAIK. Furthermore, by including such terms as
sh:AbstractAllowedValuesPropertyConstraint are we requiring
implementers to support this design, i.e. to understand what it means
to subclass from this template class? I'd prefer to see this type of
detail removed from the core vocabulary and moved to an
implementation-specific vocabulary that was not normative.

The current vocabulary omits refs:isDefinedBy triples which are
normally how terms are linked to the vocabulary.

-- Arthur

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that
> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/56429ef268a14e29586244ab944b310ea84cbf46/shacl/shacl.shacl.ttl
> Has the document I was looking for.
>
> peter
>
>
>
>
> On 09/24/2015 01:37 PM, Arthur Ryman wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> You can look at the commit history for the branch.[1] I saw a commit
>> described as "Latest TTL File" [2].
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commits/gh-pages/shacl
>> [2] https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/56429ef268a14e29586244ab944b310ea84cbf46#diff-dd3652a97f249d2a18a436bd4fac69c5
>>
>> -- Arthur
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> How does one find the Turtle file now?
>>>
>>> peter
>>>

Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 21:34:25 UTC