- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:33:53 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Peter, Yep. My concern with that file is that it contains many terms not discussed or reviewed by the WG. I feel that it reflects how Holger implemented his processor. For example, he decided to implement the built-ins as templates, which has a certain elegance, but is not required for compliance AFAIK. Furthermore, by including such terms as sh:AbstractAllowedValuesPropertyConstraint are we requiring implementers to support this design, i.e. to understand what it means to subclass from this template class? I'd prefer to see this type of detail removed from the core vocabulary and moved to an implementation-specific vocabulary that was not normative. The current vocabulary omits refs:isDefinedBy triples which are normally how terms are linked to the vocabulary. -- Arthur On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > I think that > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/56429ef268a14e29586244ab944b310ea84cbf46/shacl/shacl.shacl.ttl > Has the document I was looking for. > > peter > > > > > On 09/24/2015 01:37 PM, Arthur Ryman wrote: >> Peter, >> >> You can look at the commit history for the branch.[1] I saw a commit >> described as "Latest TTL File" [2]. >> >> [1] https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commits/gh-pages/shacl >> [2] https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/56429ef268a14e29586244ab944b310ea84cbf46#diff-dd3652a97f249d2a18a436bd4fac69c5 >> >> -- Arthur >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: >>> How does one find the Turtle file now? >>> >>> peter >>>
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 21:34:25 UTC