public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from September 2015 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015 (Wednesday, 30 September)
• UCR WD published! (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-93 (hsolbrig): SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-93 (hsolbrig): SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for F2F 8-10 September 2015 (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 24 September 2015 (Thursday, 24 September)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 24 September 2015 (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Editorial work question (Wednesday, 23 September)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 17 September 2015 (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Spec has been updated (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Thursday, 17 September)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 17 September 2015 (Thursday, 17 September)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for F2F 8-10 September 2015 (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Shall we add sh:InversePropertyScope and sh:AllObjectsScope? (Saturday, 5 September)
• Spec editing and Github (Friday, 4 September)
• RDF Data Shape WG Minutes for 3 September (Friday, 4 September)
• Feedback on SHACL Editor's draft (Wednesday, 2 September)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 3 September 2015 (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Primer? (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)

Arthur Ryman

• Probably Regrets for 2015-10-01 WG Telecon (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: Suggested redesign of Operations section (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:" (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Saturday, 26 September)
• Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-88 (labra): qualified values [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Editing examples (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-89 (recursion without properties): How should recursion that does not involve a property be handled? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for F2F 8-10 September 2015 (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: How to do repetition in SHACL (revised) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Suggested redesign of Operations section (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:" (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Suggested redesign of Operations section (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Turtle file (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Turtle file (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Proposed enhancement to the SHACL spec (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Proposed enhancement to the SHACL spec (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Editing the SHACL Spec (Thursday, 24 September)
• Editing the SHACL Spec (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Proposal for Official WG Food (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Proposal for Official WG Food (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Comments on FPWD (Wednesday, 2 September)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: my proposal for ISSUE-51 (Friday, 4 September)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• propose to make repeated-properties additive (Friday, 18 September)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: Turtle file (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: Suggested redesign of Operations section (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Suggested redesign of Operations section (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:" (Friday, 25 September)
• Changes to sh:ClosedShapeConstraint? (was: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec]) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-90 (Literal focus nodes): Can the focus node be a literal? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Question about directValueType (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Question about the behavior of property shapes (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Suggested redesign of Operations section (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Turtle file (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Monday, 21 September)
• (Editorial): SPARQL definitions can now be hidden (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-88 (labra): qualified values [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Spec has been updated (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Thursday, 17 September)
• Spec has been updated (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• SHACL spec advanced part revisited (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: question on on shacl semantics (Monday, 14 September)
• SHACL core spec revisited (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Monday, 14 September)
• ISSUE-85: spec updated (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 11 September)
• ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: logic as the compact syntax for SHACL (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: How to do repetition in SHACL (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Suggested redesign of Operations section (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: Shall we add sh:InversePropertyScope and sh:AllObjectsScope? (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: my proposal for ISSUE-51 (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Thursday, 3 September)
• Draft status (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: review of SHACL document (Second pass of responses) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Comments on FPWD (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Feedback on SHACL Editor's draft (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: review of SHACL document (First pass of responses) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Primer? (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)

Iovka Boneva

• Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: question on on shacl semantics (Monday, 14 September)
• question on on shacl semantics (Wednesday, 9 September)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: Editing examples (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document (Friday, 4 September)

Karen Coyle

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Editing examples (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Monday, 21 September)
• Editorial work question (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-88 (labra): qualified values [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Saturday, 19 September)
• Editing examples (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-87 (Turtle file): Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81: Final names of property pair constraints? (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: Proposal for Official WG Food (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: fixing http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: Shall we add sh:InversePropertyScope and sh:AllObjectsScope? (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: Shall we add sh:InversePropertyScope and sh:AllObjectsScope? (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: my proposal for ISSUE-51 (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: How to do repetition in SHACL (revised) (Friday, 25 September)
• issue nicknames (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-90 (Literal focus nodes): Can the focus node be a literal? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Turtle file (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Turtle file (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• Turtle file (Thursday, 24 September)
• shacl document (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: comments on current version of SHACL document (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Friday, 18 September)
• comments on current version of SHACL document (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: question on on shacl semantics (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: question on on shacl semantics (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: How to do repetition in SHACL (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: How to do repetition in SHACL (Wednesday, 9 September)
• How to do repetition in SHACL (revised) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• logic as the compact syntax for SHACL (Wednesday, 9 September)
• How to do repetition in SHACL (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: fixing http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ (Tuesday, 8 September)
• section on the relationship between SHACL and RDFS (Tuesday, 8 September)
• fixing http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: my proposal for ISSUE-51 (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: my proposed introduction to the SHACL document (Friday, 4 September)
• my proposed introduction to the SHACL document (Friday, 4 September)
• my proposal for ISSUE-51 (Friday, 4 September)
• review of SHACL document (Wednesday, 2 September)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-97 (sh:derivedValues): Proposal to define constraints using derived values [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 29 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-96 (Violation IDs): Should the validation results contain stable IDs to indicate the type of violation [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 29 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-95 (Template Simplifications): Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 29 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-94 (hsolbrig): Should RDF syntax requirements be separated from SHACL semantics [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-93 (hsolbrig): SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-91 (hsolbrig): Default Cardinality [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 24 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-90 (Literal focus nodes): Can the focus node be a literal? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 21 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-89 (recursion without properties): How should recursion that does not involve a property be handled? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 15 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-88 (labra): qualified values [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 11 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-87 (Turtle file): Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 11 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 10 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-85 (only one xor): what is the definition of XOR? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 9 September)
• shapes-ACTION-29: Provide a proposal for recursion (from oscl + shex static analysis) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• shapes-ISSUE-84 (Allowed IRIs): Constraint to limit IRIs of focus nodes to a given enumeration (similar to owl:oneOf) [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 2 September)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:" (Monday, 28 September)
• AW: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:" (Friday, 25 September)
• Reference to ReSpec without "http:" (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: question on on shacl semantics (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: question on on shacl semantics (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Tuesday, 1 September)

Solbrig, Harold R.

• Re: issue nicknames (Friday, 25 September)
• Question about directValueType (Thursday, 24 September)
• Question about datatype property constraint. (Thursday, 24 September)
• Question about the behavior of property shapes (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Proposed enhancement to the SHACL spec (Thursday, 24 September)
• Another formatting proposal. (Thursday, 24 September)
• Proposed enhancement to the SHACL spec (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Editing the SHACL Spec (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Proposal for Official WG Food (Tuesday, 8 September)

Solbrig, Harold R., M.S.

• Re: Probably Regrets for 2015-10-01 WG Telecon (Wednesday, 30 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2015 23:37:33 UTC