- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:33:14 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I have applied my editorial liberty to restructure Part 2 (Advanced Features) of the spec. This never got enough attention so far. I had first looked into moving the SPARQL bits into another document, as was suggested during the meeting. However, I have concluded that this would not be a good idea. The issue is that if we want to introduce Templates, Functions and general Scopes, each example would already use sh:sparql. Once we give these examples, we could just as well add the few more sub-sections on the details of sh:sparql. The spec makes clear that sh:sparql is just one possibility among others. I believe the document is this way much more self-contained, less confusing and our publishing job actually becomes easier. The overall size of the Advanced section compared to the Core part is very small (maybe 25%), and the SPARQL details were probably 30% of that. I also reworked the examples and much of the wording, updating to the latest agreements on terminology. Finally I redid the Operations section based on my recent email. It is much shorter now, and no longer has the separate concept of execution languages. We need to decide what to do with that section - I'd say we either add another level of detail or we discard it altogether. If we discard it then the behavior of the language would only be specified as prose - not sure if that suffices. Feedback and branches appreciated, as usual. I may continue with (minor) edits but otherwise believe I am done with this round of edits and hope we have a stronger release candidate now. Thanks, Holger
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 02:33:49 UTC