On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote -1 to defining optional values for any constraint. > > The current design is consistent in its treatment of absent > constraints, namely that they do not lead to any checks. It is > therefore inconsistent to say that if minCount or maxCount are absent > then they are in effect present with some default value. If is > especially inconsistent to assign default values that give a result > different than if the constraints were absent. > I agree with Arthur here, all constraints should be explicitly stated in the SHACL graph. - Dimitris -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://http://aligned-project.eu, http://rdfunit.aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Monday, 28 September 2015 07:02:58 UTC