Re: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:"

Simon/Holger,

I fail to understand the benefit of retrieving ReSpec with http:
versus https: dependent on how we retrieve the spec. If we feel that
https: is more secure then let's just put https: in the ReSpec URL.
ReSpec is not part of our spec so there is no reason to couple the
scheme used to retrieve it with the scheme used to retrieve our spec.
If we use https: for ReSpec then readers will get the added security
benefit. Why would anyone want to retrieve ReSpec using http:?

-- Arthur

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote:
> +1
>
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
> Datum: 26.09.2015 01:04 (GMT+01:00)
> An: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Reference to ReSpec without "http:"
>
> On 9/26/15 4:37 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> That was me. I recently had to add the http: part so I could view the
>> formatted spec from the file system while editing. How do you suggest
>> that editors work? Copy respect to their file system? Delete the http:
>> part before committing?
>
> When I start editing I usually insert the http: and (unless I forget it)
> take it back out before committing.
>
> Holger
>
>

Received on Sunday, 27 September 2015 22:22:53 UTC