Re: propose to make repeated-properties additive

On 9/22/15, 12:46 AM, "Holger Knublauch" <> wrote:
Yes, and the current SHACL design is IMHO intuitive for anyone who never
had any exposure to OWL or RDF, e.g. from an object-oriented world. When
you see a minimum cardinality in UML it aligns exactly with SHACL.

I checked and the defaults for minimum and maximum cardinality
(MultiplicityElement.lowerBound() and upperBound() in UML are both 1.  I
filed an issue proposing that we change the current 0..* defaults to 1..1
to make the above statement true.

Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 14:52:51 UTC