- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 09:15:42 -0700
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I feel that the version of http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ that I reviewed (dated 10 August 2015) has three fatal problems. - It does not reflect working group consensus. - It provides a poor and misleading description of SHACL. - It has multiple severe technical problems. Fixing of any of these problems requires significant changes to the document. Fixing the worst aspects of these problems requires at least the following changes: - Writing an introduction that reasonably describes SHACL. - Replacing the example that uses controversial aspects of SHACL. - Using a well-defined vocabulary to describe the major SHACL notions. - Correctly describing the relationship between SHACL and RDFS and SPARQL. - Discussing recursive shapes. - Fixing or removing the UML diagrams. - Fixing the description of how violations are reported. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications
Received on Monday, 7 September 2015 16:16:48 UTC