public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from May 2015 by subject

a path towards implementing the way forward

Added not, and, xor to my draft

Added two requirements for validating rdf:Lists; resolves ISSUE-46

Advanced notice of proposal to be made on our weekly call to move us forward

availability Wednesday

Co-Editor for SHACL Spec

Comments about the Concepts in the SHACL Document

creating a formal definitions portion for the SHACL WD

draft presentation for VF2F

editing SHACL specification document or fragment

Fwd: Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass?

good standing in W3C working groups

implementing today's resolution

Invited experts?

ISSUE-1: Inferencing and current databases

ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes

ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass?

ISSUE-3 how to specify the shape information and the data information

multiple value shape?

My proposal to move us forward

New user story: S46: Software regression testing with SHACL

One example

preliminary analysis of shape expressions proposal

Profile/shapes discussion at public-lod

Proposal c)

Proposal for ISSUE-1

question about http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/

Question on closed shapes

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 07 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 28 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG F2F4 Poll

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 14 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 May 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 30 April 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 May 2015

Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages

Regrets for 2015-05-28

Regrets for 28-05 telco

S45: Linked Data Update via HTTP GET and PUT

SHACL name

shapes-ACTION-21: Arrange https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/facet_property_names to have a table of aspects of contraints (x) and coherent proposals (y)

shapes-ACTION-22: Propose a "more compelling" use case for = and != for property paths (issue-41, issue-42)

shapes-ACTION-23: Write up semantics (eq, ne, and any other constraint aspect) in the face of zero-or-more results to a property path

shapes-ACTION-24: Write requirement coming from issue-48

shapes-ACTION-25: Announce a stable version of the semantics document so we can have a review cycle

shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger)

shapes-ISSUE-49 (Dimitris): Distinction between scoped and unscoped shapes [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group

shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-52 (labra): Define an Abstract Syntax for SHACL [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-53 (labra): Conjunction of shapes [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-54 (labra): Disjunction on shapes [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-55 (labra): Triple constraints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-56 (labra): Inverse triple constraints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-57 (labra): Grouping of Shapes [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-58 (labra): Closed shapes [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-59 (labra): Cardinalities and default cardinalities [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-61 (Direction of sh:nodeShape): Direction of individual scoping: sh:nodeShape vs. sh:individualScope [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-62 (General selection or filtering): Selection or filtering by arbitrary expressions and shapes [SHACL Spec]

Suggestions for test cases framework

telecon details for F2F

Test instance data

tomorrow's access code: 640 696 335

two points about presentations to the working group

unannounced changes to http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/

update to SHACL-SPARQL

Updated F2F agenda

what is the ShEx proposal

Last message date: Sunday, 31 May 2015 22:55:05 UTC