Re: what is the ShEx proposal

* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-05-18 09:47-0700]
> So you would say that the three documents all describe one coherent proposal.

That's the intent. We're of course always interested in help improving
them.


> peter
> 
> 
> On 05/18/2015 09:38 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-05-18
> > 08:56-0700]
> >> At the VF2F there is a session on ShEx proposal deep-dive/demo.  I'm 
> >> assuming that this is going to be about the first proposal in 
> >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Main_Page#Proposals
> >> 
> >> There are three documents listed as part of that proposal with Eric,
> >> Holger, and Iovka as editors of one or more of the documents.
> >> 
> >> Do all three editors stand behind the entirety of the three documents?
> > 
> > I have no idea how to measure that. I'm sure no one thinks the docs are
> > ready for REC. I'm sure they're all fine for FPWD.
> > 
> > 
> >> Are all three documents part of the ShEx proposal?
> > 
> > Yes, tutorial, semantics and SPARQL complement.
> > 
> > 
> >> Do the three documents describe one proposal?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > 
> >> peter
> >> 
> > 

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 17:45:12 UTC