- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:04:58 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Thanks to Jose and Dimitris to get the test suite started. A few suggestions
- sht:schema is probably not the best name - what about sht:shapesGraph
(and sht:dataGraph)?
- sht:schema-format and shr:data-format should be optional - can be
derived from file suffix
- If SHACL is expressed in itself then many sht:WellFormedSchema test
cases can be handled with sht:Validate
- ms:result cannot only be true or false. Some tests produce multiple
constraint violations, the violations may be warnings only, and we need
to be able to verify the error details. While true may be sufficient for
some tests and implementations, we will need the ability to point at a
graph with results, or (even better) allow the expected results to be
stated inline, e.g.
mf:result [
a sh:Error ;
sh:subject ex:JohnDoe ;
] ... (multiple values allowed)
In those tests, sh:message should usually be optional.
Thanks
Holger
Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 00:06:56 UTC