public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from May 2015 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 May 2015 (Thursday, 28 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 28 May 2015 (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Advanced notice of proposal to be made on our weekly call to move us forward (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: good standing in W3C working groups (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Friday, 22 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 May 2015 (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Thursday, 21 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 May 2015 (Wednesday, 20 May)
• My proposal to move us forward (Wednesday, 20 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 May 2015 (Wednesday, 20 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG F2F4 Poll (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Updated F2F agenda (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: Invited experts? (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Updated F2F agenda (Friday, 15 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 14 May 2015 (Friday, 15 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 May 2015 (Thursday, 14 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 May 2015 (Wednesday, 13 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 30 April 2015 (Friday, 1 May)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Advanced notice of proposal to be made on our weekly call to move us forward (Thursday, 28 May)
• Regrets for 2015-05-28 (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: ISSUE-3 how to specify the shape information and the data information (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: two points about presentations to the working group (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Question on closed shapes (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Thursday, 21 May)
• S45: Linked Data Update via HTTP GET and PUT (Thursday, 21 May)
• Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: My proposal to move us forward (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Question on closed shapes (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes (Thursday, 7 May)

Bart van Leeuwen

• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)

Dean Allemang

• Re: SHACL name (Friday, 29 May)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Regrets for 28-05 telco (Thursday, 28 May)
• New user story: S46: Software regression testing with SHACL (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: ISSUE-1: Inferencing and current databases (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Fwd: Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Friday, 15 May)
• Fwd: Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Friday, 8 May)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• tomorrow's access code: 640 696 335 (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: what is the ShEx proposal (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: what is the ShEx proposal (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Proposal c) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Proposal c) (Thursday, 7 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 07 May 2015 (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Proposal c) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: Comments about the Concepts in the SHACL Document (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: creating a formal definitions portion for the SHACL WD (Friday, 29 May)
• SHACL name (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Friday, 22 May)
• Suggestions for test cases framework (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Question on closed shapes (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-3 how to specify the shape information and the data information (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: My proposal to move us forward (Thursday, 21 May)
• Added not, and, xor to my draft (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Invited experts? (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: One example (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: what is the ShEx proposal (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Invited experts? (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: One example (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: One example (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: One example (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: Updated F2F agenda (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: Fwd: Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: Fwd: Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Sunday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Sunday, 10 May)
• Re: Proposal c) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Question on closed shapes (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Proposal c) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Proposal c) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Proposal c) (Friday, 1 May)

Iovka Boneva

• Re: My proposal to move us forward (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Updated F2F agenda (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: question about http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: unannounced changes to http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: preliminary analysis of shape expressions proposal (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: preliminary analysis of shape expressions proposal (Tuesday, 5 May)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: multiple value shape? (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: SHACL name (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: availability Wednesday (Wednesday, 20 May)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Friday, 22 May)

Karen Coyle

• Re: SHACL name (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Profile/shapes discussion at public-lod (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: One example (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: One example (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: One example (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: One example (Sunday, 17 May)
• One example (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 May 2015 (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: Question on closed shapes (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Test instance data (Wednesday, 6 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• a path towards implementing the way forward (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: Comments about the Concepts in the SHACL Document (Saturday, 30 May)
• editing SHACL specification document or fragment (Friday, 29 May)
• Comments about the Concepts in the SHACL Document (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: creating a formal definitions portion for the SHACL WD (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: SHACL name (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: multiple value shape? (Thursday, 28 May)
• implementing today's resolution (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: Suggestions for test cases framework (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Friday, 22 May)
• update to SHACL-SPARQL (Friday, 22 May)
• good standing in W3C working groups (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Thursday, 21 May)
• ISSUE-3 how to specify the shape information and the data information (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 21 May)
• two points about presentations to the working group (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-1: Inferencing and current databases (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: question about http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: availability Wednesday (Wednesday, 20 May)
• availability Wednesday (Wednesday, 20 May)
• question about http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: telecon details for F2F (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: unannounced changes to http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: what is the ShEx proposal (Monday, 18 May)
• draft presentation for VF2F (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: what is the ShEx proposal (Monday, 18 May)
• what is the ShEx proposal (Monday, 18 May)
• unannounced changes to http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-24: Write requirement coming from issue-48 (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 May 2015 (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: preliminary analysis of shape expressions proposal (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: preliminary analysis of shape expressions proposal (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: preliminary analysis of shape expressions proposal (Wednesday, 6 May)
• preliminary analysis of shape expressions proposal (Friday, 1 May)

Ralph TQ [Gmail]

• Re: SHACL name (Friday, 29 May)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-62 (General selection or filtering): Selection or filtering by arbitrary expressions and shapes [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 30 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-61 (Direction of sh:nodeShape): Direction of individual scoping: sh:nodeShape vs. sh:individualScope [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 30 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 30 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-59 (labra): Cardinalities and default cardinalities [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-58 (labra): Closed shapes [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-57 (labra): Grouping of Shapes [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-56 (labra): Inverse triple constraints [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-55 (labra): Triple constraints [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-54 (labra): Disjunction on shapes [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-53 (labra): Conjunction of shapes [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-52 (labra): Define an Abstract Syntax for SHACL [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 23 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-51 (Results Vocabulary): What types of validation results should be returned [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-50 (presentation requirements): Presentations to the working group (Thursday, 21 May)
• shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• shapes-ACTION-25: Announce a stable version of the semantics document so we can have a review cycle (Tuesday, 19 May)
• shapes-ACTION-24: Write requirement coming from issue-48 (Thursday, 14 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-49 (Dimitris): Distinction between scoped and unscoped shapes [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 13 May)
• shapes-ACTION-23: Write up semantics (eq, ne, and any other constraint aspect) in the face of zero-or-more results to a property path (Thursday, 7 May)
• shapes-ACTION-22: Propose a "more compelling" use case for = and != for property paths (issue-41, issue-42) (Thursday, 7 May)
• shapes-ACTION-21: Arrange https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/facet_property_names to have a table of aspects of contraints (x) and coherent proposals (y) (Thursday, 7 May)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 May 2015 (Thursday, 14 May)
• Added two requirements for validating rdf:Lists; resolves ISSUE-46 (Thursday, 7 May)

Simon Steyskal

• Co-Editor for SHACL Spec (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: SHACL name (Friday, 29 May)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• RE: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 31 May)

Solbrig, Harold R.

• RE: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 May 2015 (Thursday, 14 May)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: shapes-ACTION-21: Arrange https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/facet_property_names to have a table of aspects of contraints (x) and coherent proposals (y) (Thursday, 28 May)

Thomas Weber

• multiple value shape? (Thursday, 28 May)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 May 2015 22:55:05 UTC