- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 20:35:20 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 03:35:52 UTC
Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote on 05/28/2015 06:30:44 PM: > ... > And yes, SPARQL is always a fallback. Only in implementations that support SPARQL extensions. It's been clearly established that there is interest in implementations that don't support SPARQL and there are users that don't want to use SPARQL. So, we'd better stop thinking that "SPARQL is always a fallback". It isn't. Given that, I think the answer to Thomas's question is more precisely: No, we don't have built-in support (i.e. core construct) for this at this point but it has been brought up. > ... -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Software Group
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 03:35:52 UTC