Re: multiple value shape?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 05/29/2015 06:41 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote on 05/29/2015 
> 05:15:37 AM:
> 
>> ... There will be SPARQL-based implementations of SHACL, and these 
>> implementations will include the ability to use the raw SPARQL
>> construct of SHACL.  If other implementations of SHACL do not implement
>> this part of SHACL, then all that that means is that these
>> implementations cannot avail themselves of this useful feature.  Users
>> can always switch to an implementation that does support this part of
>> SHACL, and thus "SPARQL is always a fallback" for them.
>> 
> 
> Except that not all users will be able to switch to such an
> implementation. I believe you have in mind the common but use case where
> a generic/vanilla rdf datastore is used. In other cases such as those I
> know of where RDF is used as a thin layer on top of legacy software
> SPARQL support isn't an option and switching implementation isn't
> either. -- Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web
> Technologies - IBM Software Group

Why not?  If it is possible to view the data as RDF, then should be possible
to query it using SPARQL.

peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVaG8uAAoJECjN6+QThfjzrO8IAJGAuBPN74v+0vi55MZBFYjx
tCUBhEsftFwzm+PmpToUhMPPMa+qtNnnQvApzq3b53guj90rMUnZ4GL/WH+59H+s
v8GIEpEiHkUaDY8e3sL9f0n3j38n2fBexYHzmM5KRzUIZll/EMDebaWq768EEuMk
fQdeZTXdI5fuasuKtrK6Gr3I8zNASIXerW0IC2KBgvAbhh5vVn53WS2UDuYuwKGM
gNagY0CVU/CxIfNrO0e8RaM9KO2wq1Sn8NisMXXSOWVaGheGxxTsa2NJsR4QI5hD
7kfTPcJ1asB0QIaNFZjz69qECab0fukZF1YFkwwtO+akf7oRGy5+HB3JXxonvyk=
=pjOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 13:53:16 UTC