- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:36:28 -0700
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I don't see how the example at http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-primer/#shapes can be handled by the mechanisms in http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ peter On 05/18/2015 09:38 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-05-18 > 08:56-0700] >> At the VF2F there is a session on ShEx proposal deep-dive/demo. I'm >> assuming that this is going to be about the first proposal in >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Main_Page#Proposals >> >> There are three documents listed as part of that proposal with Eric, >> Holger, and Iovka as editors of one or more of the documents. >> >> Do all three editors stand behind the entirety of the three documents? > > I have no idea how to measure that. I'm sure no one thinks the docs are > ready for REC. I'm sure they're all fine for FPWD. > > >> Are all three documents part of the ShEx proposal? > > Yes, tutorial, semantics and SPARQL complement. > > >> Do the three documents describe one proposal? > > Yes. > > >> peter >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVWjErAAoJECjN6+QThfjznzAH/RNnZr+gdy7npKygAWaELcGy ssbbKT3f3CV13L+LJeGi3FSnj2Ucbfe9zPrHmZijo3v6h0xFU6E2GBvMXh2P/Rl9 QhqpwLjDiP2bl+nwYwUDqws8XuWJehk28VA6Nkk4ScuoerwtugryTRn3CslXhEsK McwT88BCveQPA+w3orTGFsfnc0D7zu5Hqnp4zBuRti5roFHOwb0RBL7ynGx+YrR3 BTPIm6X0HFy2Ikb7XPGYdU2nva/bIQpo51owKvHTs9xEodMiA67Mlkl9ubzpqk1F +FudyQd7rdy13ya+rMuGC09UKE/0FXqe0qwPt9b012kOJU89aS3llxpzkpoij3s= =qbc8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 18:36:59 UTC