public-cdf@w3.org from January 2006 by date

Tuesday, 31 January 2006

• Re: [WICD Core 1.0] 6.3.1 Focus Navigation Timur Mehrvarz
• RE: CDR: Event-related markup Ian Hickson
• Re: [CDR] Multiple Child Documents? Ian Hickson
• Re: [WICD] comments [#6 and #7] Bert Bos
• Re: [CDR Framework] i18n comment: Language identification for child documents Martin Duerst
• RE: CDR: Event-related markup Jon Ferraiolo
• Re: CDR: Event-related markup Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: CDR: Event-related markup Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [WICD] comments Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [WICD] comments Mark Baker
• Re: CDR: Event-related markup Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CDR: pointer event description vs. z-order Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [WICD] comments Mark Baker
• Re: CDR: Event-related markup Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CDR/WICD: need another last call (at minimum) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• CDR: referencingElement name Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR/WICD: need another last call (at minimum) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [WICD] comments Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: CDR user agent conformance; DOM shouldn't be mandatory Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [WICD] comments Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [WICD] comments Mark Baker

Sunday, 29 January 2006

• Re: [WICD] comments Timur Mehrvarz

Tuesday, 31 January 2006

• RE: CDR: pointer event description vs. z-order Jon Ferraiolo
• Re: CDR: pointer event description vs. z-order Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [WICD Core 1.0] XHTML passing to SVG renderer ACTION: 416 Kevin E Kelly
• Re: [WICD] comments Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [WICD Core 1.0] Section 5.1 Jeff Schiller
• Re: [CDR] Multiple Child Documents? L. David Baron
• Re: [CDR Framework] i18n comment: Language identification for child documents Mark Baker
• Re: [WICD Core 1.0] Section 5.1 L. David Baron

Monday, 30 January 2006

• Re: [WICD] comments [#6 and #7] L. David Baron
• [CDR] Multiple Child Documents? Jeff Schiller
• [CDR] Typos/Grammar Jeff Schiller
• [WICD Core 1.0] 6.3.1 Focus Navigation Jeff Schiller
• [WICD Core 1.0] Animated Backgrounds? Jeff Schiller
• [WICD Core 1.0] XHTML passing to SVG renderer Jeff Schiller
• [WICD Core 1.0] Section html:img and html:object Jeff Schiller
• [WICD Core 1.0] Section 5.1 Jeff Schiller
• CDF comments Oskari.Koskimies@nokia.com
• Re: CDR: Event-related markup Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CDR: pointer event description vs. z-order L. David Baron

Sunday, 29 January 2006

• Re: Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents David Carlisle
• Re: Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents David Carlisle

Saturday, 28 January 2006

• Re: [WICD] comments Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] comments Bert Bos
• Re: Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents David Carlisle
• Re: WAI last call comments on CDF, WICD, WICD Full, WICD Mobile, WICD Core Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 27 January 2006

• Math IG comments on CDF Last call documents David Carlisle
• WAI last call comments on CDF, WICD, WICD Full, WICD Mobile, WICD Core Al Gilman
• Re: [SVGMobile12] A.7.19 parseXML Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 25 January 2006

• Re: [CDR Framework] i18n comment: Versions of XML and XMLNamespaces Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD Core 1.0] i18n comment: Spelling error fsasaki@w3.org
• [WICD Core 1.0] i18n comment: IRI support forhyperlinking fsasaki@w3.org
• [CDR Framework] i18n comment: General support of IRI fsasaki@w3.org
• [CDR Framework] i18n comment: Language identification for child documents fsasaki@w3.org
• [CDR Framework] i18n comment: Spelling error fsasaki@w3.org
• [CDR Framework] i18n comment: Versions of XML and XMLNamespaces fsasaki@w3.org
• [CDR Framework] i18n comment: About pishing fsasaki@w3.org

Monday, 23 January 2006

• Re: CDR user agent conformance; DOM shouldn't be mandatory Mark Baker
• Re: CDR user agent conformance; DOM shouldn't be mandatory Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Conformance inconsistencies Mark Baker
• CDR user agent conformance; DOM shouldn't be mandatory Mark Baker

Friday, 20 January 2006

• [WICDFull] CDR DOM interfaces Anne van Kesteren
• [WICDFull] Identification Anne van Kesteren
• [WICDMobile] Identification Anne van Kesteren
• [CDR] Referencing Child Objects Anne van Kesteren
• [WICDMobile] CDR DOM interfaces Anne van Kesteren
• [CDR] Link Activation Anne van Kesteren
• [CDR] Conformance Anne van Kesteren
• [CDR] Identification and Versioning Anne van Kesteren
• [CDR] Event Propagation Anne van Kesteren
• [CDR] scope Anne van Kesteren
• [CDR] Document Object Model Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] focus event triggered animations Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] events Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] MQ Anne van Kesteren
• Timeline Initialization Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] focusable child elements Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] font naming Anne van Kesteren
• [WICDFull] focus support Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] focusable property Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] Hyperlinking Anne van Kesteren
• [WICDMobile] focus support Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] rightsizing Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] background image size Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] Scalable Overlay Objects Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] still-image rendering Anne van Kesteren
• [WICD] scope editorial Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 18 January 2006

• XLink 1.1: behaviour of simple links without a show attribute Jonathan Watt

Friday, 13 January 2006

• Re: CDR: profiles specifying whether specialized DOM APIs are supported Maciej Stachowiak
• [WICD] How to create mixed SVG/CSS style sheets Bert Bos

Wednesday, 11 January 2006

• Re: CDR: profiles specifying whether specialized DOM APIs are supported Chris Lilley

Monday, 2 January 2006

• Re: CDR: Appendix B lacks testable conformance criteria for documents Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CDR: Appendix B lacks testable conformance criteria for documents Anne van Kesteren
• CDR: description of current web security model has problems Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: Appendix B lacks testable conformance criteria for user agents Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: Appendix B lacks testable conformance criteria for documents Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: who is the audience? Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: style and precision problems in definitions appendix Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: grammatical errors in profile conformance criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: security section gives inadequate account of possible attacks and of proposed security model Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: conflicting definitions of the target attribute Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: pointer event description vs. z-order Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: Event-related markup Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: Event propagation to parent documents Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: which elements should support the ReferencingElement interface? Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: viable object elements Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: requirement for child document access Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: does disabled access lead to null or an exception? Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: Security exceptions and events Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: required access to parent document Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: Requirements for the ReferenceDocument interface Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: profiles specifying whether specialized DOM APIs are supported Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: "individual DOMs in isolation" Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: Introduction, "examples of compound documents" Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: DOM Level 3 requirement Maciej Stachowiak
• CDR: language about compound documents and child documents Maciej Stachowiak

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:11:02 UTC