- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:13:03 -0800
- To: public-cdf@w3.org
Section 2.1 says: "Compound document profiles which leverage the Compound Document Framework and which support scripting must have scripting interfaces that are compatible with the DOM Level 3 Core Specification." Section 2.2 says: 2.2 "Compound document profiles which leverage the Compound Documen Framework and which support events and interactivity must have event interfaces and an event processing model that are compatible with the DOM Level 3 Events Specification." I have three comments on this: - The SVG Tiny 1.2 uDOM as currently proposed is not compatible with DOM Level 3 Core or DOM Level 3 Events. I have made many specific comments to this effect as part of SVG Tiny 1.2 Last Call 3 pointing out some of the specific issues. This makes SVG Tiny 1.2 unusable in compliant CDF profiles. I request that the CDF working group formally raise this issue with the SVG working group, to resolve the conflict in these two last call drafts. - The SVG Tiny 1.2 as currently proposed has an event model that is not compatible with DOM Level 3 Events (or any version of DOM Events) because it omits the capture phase. I have raised this issue myself as part of the SVG Tiny 1.2 Last Call 3. I request that the CDF working group formally raise this issue with the SVG working group, to resolve the conflict in these two last call drafts. - DOM Level 3 includes many novel features some of which are of questionable relevance to client-side content. I suggest that DOM Level 2 Core/Events be considered sufficient. This may be implicit in allowing DOM Level 3 subsets. I request that the sufficiency of DOM Level 2 be made explicit. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 2 January 2006 09:13:09 UTC