- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:31:57 +0100
- To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:04:25 +0100, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: >> Most of the problems the CDF WG deals with are already solved. >> We just say how they are solved. > > Quite, the current specs appear to have missed 10 years worth of > experience in rendering compound documents and are proposing to > standardise the non-support of MathML or any other similar language., > that is basically any compound document format that isn't just including > an image (including svg as an image format for the purposes of the > discussion). Actually, given <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/conform.html#intrinsic> I think the "problem" can be solved within MathML. If the MathML layout model defines a way to calculate the intrinsic 'height' and 'width' of a MathML document (this would need to be defined, taken into account embedded HTML and all that) I see no reason it can't already work just fine when embedded through <object> given the rules from CSS 2.1 for replaced elements. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:32:08 UTC