- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:55:15 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
On Jan 29, 2006, at 5:14 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2006-01-02 01:49 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> "The target element for pointer device events is established by first >> determining the most deeply nested child document which has content >> that intersects with the geometric (x,y) location of the event" >> >> - This excludes z-ordering. Therefore it seems to claim that, for >> instance, a click on a portion of a parent document that overlaps >> included child content should go through to the child content. This >> is contrary to behavior of many current UAs. > > In our face-to-face meeting, the group decided to change the quoted > sentence to: > > The target element for pointer device events is the topmost > object in > the paint order at the pointer location. This satisfies my concern, thanks. > I'd also note that this doesn't resolve any differences in the way SVG > and HTML+CSS define paint order (particularly with whether > 'visibility:hidden' elements receive events). Does the CDF working group plan to tackle this issue in any of the specs? Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 02:55:29 UTC