Re: [WICD] comments

* Mark Baker wrote:
>> >Actually, it's generally agreed in IETF circles that "text/html" was
>> >the incorrect type to use for HTML, which is the reason the former
>> >HTML WG opted for "application/xhtml+xml" for XHTML.  See;
>> >
>> >
>> It seems turning some opinion on the "general consensus of the MIME
>> community" into a statement of fact about "IETF circles" is quite a
>> stretch...
>The referenced message from the ietf-xml-mime archive was just one
>example.  As a member of those "IETF circles", I stand by my statement
>that the use of text/* is generally frowned upon for use with XML.

Use of text/* for XML beeing frowned upon and text/html beeing the
incorrect type for HTML are different things though...
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 ·
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · 

Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 07:05:02 UTC