Thursday, 25 September 2008
Tuesday, 23 September 2008
Tuesday, 16 September 2008
- Potential future comments on CT
- Re: Comments on "Content Transformation Guidelines 1.0"
- Comments on "Content Transformation Guidelines 1.0"
Thursday, 11 September 2008
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
- Re: Transcoders to retreat from any reformatting in case of Mobile-optimised site
- Transcoders to retreat from any reformatting in case of Mobile-optimised site
- Preservation of Content Ownership
Monday, 8 September 2008
Friday, 5 September 2008
- Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call?
- GET safety, was: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call?
- Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call?
- list of comments in the tracking system?
Thursday, 4 September 2008
- Re: Feedback on content transformation guidelines
- Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call?
- Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call?
Friday, 29 August 2008
- Re: Content Transformatnion Guidelines: Last Call Working Draft
- mobile OK tests: HTTPS considerations
- Feedback on content transformation guidelines
Thursday, 28 August 2008
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
Wednesday, 27 August 2008
Tuesday, 26 August 2008
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
Tuesday, 12 August 2008
- Re: [W3C] BPWG CTG Guidelines / HTTP field user-agent issues
- [W3C] BPWG CTG Guidelines / HTTP field user-agent issues
Monday, 11 August 2008
- RE: [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / completeness
- [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / completeness
- RE: WICD Core 10.0: Intended Layout
Friday, 8 August 2008
Thursday, 7 August 2008
- [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / Guidelines clarifications - correction
- Re: [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / Guidelines clarifications
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
Wednesday, 6 August 2008
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Changing User Agent Header Value (was Re: transcoders bad)
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: User-Agent Header?
- Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call?
- Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)
- Re: [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / HTTPS comments
- User-Agent Header?
Tuesday, 5 August 2008
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call?
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / comments
- Re: [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / comments
- Re: transcoders bad
- Re: transcoders bad
- [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / HTTPS comments
- Re: [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / comments
- Re: [W3C] Draft Mobile Web BPWG / comments
- Re: comment on 1 August 2008 draft of Content Transformation Guidelines 1.0
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: transcoders bad
Monday, 4 August 2008
Tuesday, 5 August 2008
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- RE: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- RE: transcoders bad
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: comment on 1 August 2008 draft of Content Transformation Guidelines 1.0
- RE: transcoders bad
- comment on 1 August 2008 draft of Content Transformation Guidelines 1.0
- Re: transcoders bad
Monday, 4 August 2008
Tuesday, 5 August 2008
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
Monday, 4 August 2008
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- RE: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- RE: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: [CT-Guidelines Last Call] Clarification needed
- Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)
- Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)
- [CT-Guidelines LC] meta HTTP-Equiv
- RE: [public-bpwg-comments] <none>
- [public-bpwg-comments] <none>
- RE: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)
- Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)
- [CT-Guidelines LC] (Editorial) Difficult to understand
- [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (III)
- [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (II)
- [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)
- Re: [CT-Guidelines Last Call] Clarification needed
- RE: [CT-Guidelines Last Call] Clarification needed
- Re: [CT-Guidelines Last Call] Clarification needed
- [CT-Guidelines Last Call] Clarification needed
- Re: W3C Content Transformation Guidelines - Last Call - comments welcome
- W3C Content Transformation Guidelines - Last Call - comments welcome
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Comments on Content Transformation Guidelines?
- Re: Requirement for keeping the code valid after content transformation
- Re: LC comment on Content Transformation Guidelines 1.0
Saturday, 2 August 2008
Friday, 1 August 2008
Thursday, 31 July 2008
- Re: Clarifications on HTTP Response tests ( LC-1991 LC-1992)
- Re: More clarifications on object processing ( LC-1978 LC-1979 LC-1980 LC-1981)
- Re: Clarifications on HTTP Response tests ( LC-1991 LC-1992)
- Re: More clarifications on object processing ( LC-1978 LC-1979 LC-1980 LC-1981)
Monday, 7 July 2008
Sunday, 6 July 2008
Friday, 4 July 2008
- RE: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- Re: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- Re: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- RE: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- Re: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- Re: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- RE: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- Re: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test
- STYLE_SHEETS_USE test