RE: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)

ok, perfect ! thanks for the clarification ...

If Francois can ammend my comment referencing RFC 3986 section 4.4 instead of RFC 1808 that would be great.

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt

Best Regards

-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org] En nombre de Julian Reschke
Enviado el: lunes, 04 de agosto de 2008 17:51
Para: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
CC: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Asunto: Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)


JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote:
> ...
> As per RFC 1808 an empty relative URI href="" resolves to complete base URL, so it is suggested to use this mechanism to point to the current resource
> ...

You really don't want to cite RFC 1808 anymore. It has been obsoleted by
RFC 3986 over three years ago.

BR, Julian