- From: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:01:18 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "public-bpwg-comments@w3.org" <public-bpwg-comments@w3.org>
ok, perfect ! thanks for the clarification ... If Francois can ammend my comment referencing RFC 3986 section 4.4 instead of RFC 1808 that would be great. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt Best Regards -----Mensaje original----- De: public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org] En nombre de Julian Reschke Enviado el: lunes, 04 de agosto de 2008 17:51 Para: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA CC: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org Asunto: Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I) JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote: > ... > As per RFC 1808 an empty relative URI href="" resolves to complete base URL, so it is suggested to use this mechanism to point to the current resource > ... You really don't want to cite RFC 1808 anymore. It has been obsoleted by RFC 3986 over three years ago. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 16:02:17 UTC