Re: STYLE_SHEETS_USE test

Actually ref the following

 > This is what the embedded CSS defines, and e embedded CSS defines:
 >  body { color: black; } -> good
 >  p { font-size: whatever; } -> unknown value, checker should raise a
 > warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE
 >  ul { word-spacing: 42things; } -> unknown unit, checker should raise a
 > warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE
 >  li { yeepee: 20px; } -> unknown property, checker should ignore the
 > property and the value

the last one should be a WARN unknown property.

Jo

On 04/07/2008 17:03, Francois Daoust wrote:
> Removing the other (valid) points to focus on the part I'm interesting 
> in...
> 
> Abel Rionda wrote:
>> -I do no see a way to deactivate these features in our CSS validation
>> tool (CSS Validator makes a complete grammar validation) and making an
>> ad-hoc solution would tale a considerable development effort.
>> Particularly, STYLE_SHEETS_USE test (currently these subtests are not
>> made) is going to be hard to implement basing on the checker design and
>> our limited time to dedicate to this.
> 
> Either I don't understand the problem, which is totally possible - I 
> wonder if was even born at the time of the first Last Call - either the 
> CSS validator we use already is correctly configured. But there is a bug 
> in the checker I would say.
> 
> I created a simple test:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/07/mokcsstest.html
> 
> This is what the embedded CSS defines, and e embedded CSS defines:
>  body { color: black; } -> good
>  p { font-size: whatever; } -> unknown value, checker should raise a 
> warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE
>  ul { word-spacing: 42things; } -> unknown unit, checker should raise a 
> warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE
>  li { yeepee: 20px; } -> unknown property, checker should ignore the 
> property and the value
> 
> The whole thing should not trigger any FAIL, but raise two WARN, if I 
> understand things correctly.
> It does trigger a FAIL currently on "yeepee: 20px" because of the use of 
> an absolute unit since "yeepee" is an unknown property, but that's a bug.
> 
> In particular, the checker does not fail on the unknown properties and 
> values because of the underlying CSS validator.
> Did I miss something?
> Would you have a simple example in that case, so that I understand what 
> we're talking about?
> 
> Francois.
>

Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 17:06:10 UTC