- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:45:33 +0200
- To: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- CC: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>, "public-bpwg-comments@w3.org" <public-bpwg-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for the comment, José, This is just a FYI, to let you know that I added it to our Last Call comments tracker. We'll address it and get back to you a bit later on. Francois. JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote: > Yes, I know, but the document should say that, otherwise implementors would need to go to check the HTTP spec and so on, making it more difficult to read the spec > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org] En nombre de Sean Owen > Enviado el: lunes, 04 de agosto de 2008 16:33 > Para: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA > CC: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > Asunto: Re: [CT-Guidelines Last Call] Clarification needed > > > For example if the representation varies based on the User-Agent > header, the response should contain the header: > > Vary: User-Agent > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:29 AM, JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA > <jmcf@tid.es> wrote: >> 4.2.3.1 >> >> >> >> If a server varies its representation according to examination of received >> HTTP headers then it must include a Vary HTTP header indicating this to be >> the case. If, in addition to, or instead of HTTP headers, a server varies >> its representation based on other factors (e.g. source IP Address) then it >> must, in accordance with [RFC 2616 HTTP], include a Vary header containing >> the value '*'. >> >> >> >> What should contain the Vary HTTP Header when a server varies its >> representation according to examination of received HTTP headers? >> >> >> >> Best Regards > > >
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 14:45:17 UTC