- From: Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:12:28 +0200
- To: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- CC: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, Terren Suydam <terren@singleclicksystems.com>
Sean Owen wrote: > I moved this thread to wmlprogramming, can we continue there? will you > approve my post? > approved. In fact I have whitelisted you, so you can keep on discussing while I go to sleep because it's already past midnight here. I'll look at the result tomorrow. > Your comments are well registered, along with those of developers like > me who think you are mistaken in some ways. It doesn't mean it will > change just because you made a comment, and in fact, I don't see much > support here. Assume #2 will happen. > so be it > How about leaving this list alone and continuing on wmlprogramming, > your turf? > OK Luca > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no> wrote: > >> I see two outcomes here: >> >> 1) the working group adopts developers' suggestions (imprimis User-Agent and >> HTTPS preservation), and developers endorse CTGs. >> >> 2) the working group doesn't adopt developers suggestions: I will make sure >> the mobile world knows that CTGs are NOT endorsed by developers and that W3C >> is available to put its stamp on whatever document anyone with enough money >> to seat at the W3C table wants. >> >> Personally, I would much prefer the first outcome. >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 22:13:10 UTC