- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:25:32 +0200
- To: Barry Leiba <leiba@watson.ibm.com>
- CC: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Many thanks for reviewing the document and pointing us to RFC 3238. We will review the issues in RFC 3238, and, although not formally resolved yet, are likely to mention it explicitly in next versions of the draft. Francois Daoust, W3C Staff Contact, Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group. Barry Leiba wrote: > > To the W3C Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group: > > The Internet Architecture Board has reviewed the subject document, and > notes that it has previously reviewed related work done in the IETF in > the Open Pluggable Edge Services (OPES) Working Group. In its preview > and review of OPES work, the IAB expressed its concerns about privacy, > control, monitoring, and accountability of such services in RFC 3238 [ > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3238 ]. > > We have no specific architectural concerns with the "Content > Transformation Guidelines" document as written; it does seem to take > into account the questions raised during the OPES discussions. We would > like, though, to make that explicit by specifically documenting that you > reviewed and considered the issues in RFC 3238. > > Barry Leiba, for the Internet Architecture Board ( http://iab.org ) > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:26:09 UTC