- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:30:40 +0200
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- CC: Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>, public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>, public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Jo Rabin wrote:
> Actually ref the following
>
> > This is what the embedded CSS defines, and e embedded CSS defines:
> > body { color: black; } -> good
> > p { font-size: whatever; } -> unknown value, checker should raise a
> > warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE
> > ul { word-spacing: 42things; } -> unknown unit, checker should raise a
> > warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE
> > li { yeepee: 20px; } -> unknown property, checker should ignore the
> > property and the value
>
> the last one should be a WARN unknown property.
Indeed. That's what I meant. For some reason, I got it right on the
example page:
http://www.w3.org/2008/07/mokcsstest.html
... but failed to write the same text in the email :(
Anyway, the 2 points here are:
1. I don't see any case when the CSS validator returns errors instead of
returning warnings. But I may have understood your remark incorrectly,
Abel. Were you talking about the impossibility to distinguish between
STYLE_SHEETS_USE warnings in the results returned by the CSS validator,
as you explained a bit later on?
2. There is a bug in the checker that currently returns a FAIL for
"yeepee: 20px" on the property value, instead of a WARN on the property
itself.
Francois.
Received on Sunday, 6 July 2008 21:31:26 UTC