- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:03:40 +0200
- To: Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>
- CC: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>, public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Removing the other (valid) points to focus on the part I'm interesting in... Abel Rionda wrote: > -I do no see a way to deactivate these features in our CSS validation > tool (CSS Validator makes a complete grammar validation) and making an > ad-hoc solution would tale a considerable development effort. > Particularly, STYLE_SHEETS_USE test (currently these subtests are not > made) is going to be hard to implement basing on the checker design and > our limited time to dedicate to this. Either I don't understand the problem, which is totally possible - I wonder if was even born at the time of the first Last Call - either the CSS validator we use already is correctly configured. But there is a bug in the checker I would say. I created a simple test: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/mokcsstest.html This is what the embedded CSS defines, and e embedded CSS defines: body { color: black; } -> good p { font-size: whatever; } -> unknown value, checker should raise a warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE ul { word-spacing: 42things; } -> unknown unit, checker should raise a warning under STYLE_SHEET_USE li { yeepee: 20px; } -> unknown property, checker should ignore the property and the value The whole thing should not trigger any FAIL, but raise two WARN, if I understand things correctly. It does trigger a FAIL currently on "yeepee: 20px" because of the use of an absolute unit since "yeepee" is an unknown property, but that's a bug. In particular, the checker does not fail on the unknown properties and values because of the underlying CSS validator. Did I miss something? Would you have a simple example in that case, so that I understand what we're talking about? Francois.
Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 16:04:18 UTC