Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)

JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote:
> ok, perfect ! thanks for the clarification ...
> 
> If Francois can ammend my comment referencing RFC 3986 section 4.4 instead of RFC 1808 that would be great.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt

Sure!

I updated the recorded comment, and added your other comments to the 
tracking system as well.

Thanks,
Francois.

> 
> Best Regards
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org] En nombre de Julian Reschke
> Enviado el: lunes, 04 de agosto de 2008 17:51
> Para: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
> CC: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
> Asunto: Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)
> 
> 
> JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote:
>> ...
>> As per RFC 1808 an empty relative URI href="" resolves to complete base URL, so it is suggested to use this mechanism to point to the current resource
>> ...
> 
> You really don't want to cite RFC 1808 anymore. It has been obsoleted by
> RFC 3986 over three years ago.
> 
> BR, Julian
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 18:53:09 UTC