xml-dist-app@w3.org from October 2002 by thread

Requirements check, sections 4.6 and 4.7 Jacek Kopecky (Thursday, 31 October)

Issue 392: revised proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau (Wednesday, 30 October)

Resolution of Issue 359 John Ibbotson (Wednesday, 30 October)

Yet another proposal for issue 355 Martin Gudgin (Wednesday, 30 October)

Proposed resolution text for Issue 359 John Ibbotson (Wednesday, 30 October)

Updated proposal for Issue 355 ( and 262 ) Martin Gudgin (Tuesday, 29 October)

Issue 392: draft proposals Jean-Jacques Moreau (Tuesday, 29 October)

Updates to feature list based on disposition of Last Call issues Champion, Mike (Tuesday, 29 October)

Proposal for Issue 385 (AF conformance clause) Camilo Arbelaez (Monday, 28 October)

Additions to Usage Scenarios John Ibbotson (Tuesday, 29 October)

Issue 388 Proposed Resolution Marc Hadley (Tuesday, 29 October)

Issue 294 Proposed resolution - mark II Marc Hadley (Tuesday, 29 October)

Issue 392: any one remembers? Jean-Jacques Moreau (Monday, 28 October)

Proposal for issue 390 Carine Bournez (Sunday, 27 October)

Use of XML Messaging in Multicasting? Abhishek (Sunday, 27 October)

Alternate SOAP 1.2 email binding Don Mullen (Friday, 25 October)

proposal for issue 391 (how IDREF URIs are dereferenced) Nilo Mitra (EUS) (Friday, 25 October)

Proposal for issue 394: Some unprocessed headers should stay Jean-Jacques Moreau (Friday, 25 October)

proposal for issue 393 (concrete packaging spec) Mark Jones (Thursday, 24 October)

Proposal for SOAP 1.2 LC-Issue 371: Multiple Choice Assertions Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Monday, 21 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headersshould stay Graham Klyne (Monday, 21 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 21 October)

Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Jean-Jacques Moreau (Monday, 21 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headersshould stay Jacek Kopecky (Monday, 21 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Nilo Mitra (EUS) (Friday, 18 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Friday, 18 October)

Proposed Resolution: Issue 294 - "message exchange context out of nowhere?" Marc Hadley (Friday, 18 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headersshould stay Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 18 October)

IMPLEMENTERS NOTE: Re: updated implementation summary David Fallside (Friday, 18 October)

Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Friday, 18 October)

updated implementation summary Yves Lafon (Friday, 18 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headersshould stay Jacek Kopecky (Friday, 18 October)

[AF] Proposal for Issue 387 Herve Ruellan (Friday, 18 October)

[AF] Proposal for issue 386 resolution Herve Ruellan (Friday, 18 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headersshould stay Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Thursday, 17 October)

Issue 389 proposal Jacek Kopecky (Thursday, 17 October)

Text for issue 300/359 gdaniels@macromedia.com (Thursday, 17 October)

FYI: WS-I Basic Profile Working Group Draft published Christopher B Ferris (Thursday, 17 October)

Text for issue 300/359 Glen Daniels (Thursday, 17 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Jacek Kopecky (Thursday, 17 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed header s should stay Nilo Mitra (EUS) (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Nilo Mitra (EUS) (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 16 October)

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay Nilo Mitra (EUS) (Wednesday, 16 October)

SOAP intermediaries (Some unprocessed headers should stay) Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 16 October)

Question regarding uniqueness of soap Fault in body Ed Roskos (Tuesday, 15 October)

Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 15 October)

Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 14 October)

Proposal for Issue 363 - RPC return accessor Asir S Vedamuthu (Monday, 14 October)

Proposal for issue 277 - part 2 Herve Ruellan (Monday, 14 October)

Proposal for issue 277 - part 1 Herve Ruellan (Monday, 14 October)

Issue 367 Proposal John Ibbotson (Monday, 14 October)

Issues 368 and 369 Proposal John Ibbotson (Monday, 14 October)

Anybody alive? since I haven't received any mail for a long period of time. Collin (Friday, 11 October)

Issue 364 proposal Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 9 October)

Possibly editorial problem in Data Model and Encoding Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 9 October)

Re: Proposed resolution on using schemas to default itemType and nodeClass (subissue of 231) Ray Whitmer (Monday, 7 October)

RE: Are gateways SOAP intermediaries? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Monday, 7 October)

WWW2003 Call for Papers Vinoski, Stephen (Friday, 4 October)

SOAP 1.2 Specification and confusion around Subcode Ed.Morassut@bmo.com (Friday, 4 October)

Welcome to my hometown PGoel (Friday, 4 October)

Proposal for issue 327 David Fallside (Thursday, 3 October)

RE: Proposal for various Infosetisms Martin Gudgin (Tuesday, 1 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2002 14:30:02 UTC