W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Proposal for issue 277 - part 2

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:38:28 -0400
To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Cc: "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB2F2D531.2B595DA2-ON85256C56.00509658@lotus.com>

Marc Hadley writes:

> The upgrade header block just declares support for a
> particular version and hence only the namespace is
> required - claiming to support that version means
> supporting changed or multiple root elements so there's
> no need to mention them explicitly.

This makes sense, and I now that I see your point I have no problem 
supporting your position.  On the other hand, I think that the QName might 
be valuable in practice for debugging, etc.  No big deal.  As I say, I can 
easily live with your proposal if that's your preference.  Thank you.

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 10:41:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC