Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay from Jean-Jacques Moreau on 2002-10-21 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:36:09 +0200
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
CC: XMLP Dist App <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <3DB3BC79.6060906@crf.canon.fr>

+1 for the appendix.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:

> I agree that such a table would be a great addition to the spec.
>
> From a purely editorial POW, I wonder whether a non-normative 
> appendix would be appropriate given that the exact rules are 
> already elsewhere in the spec. That way, we avoid the confusion 
> of which version is "the one that rules them all" :)

Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 04:36:02 UTC