+1 for the appendix. Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > I agree that such a table would be a great addition to the spec. > > From a purely editorial POW, I wonder whether a non-normative > appendix would be appropriate given that the exact rules are > already elsewhere in the spec. That way, we avoid the confusion > of which version is "the one that rules them all" :)Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 04:36:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC